0.03/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 960 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 120 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 03:20:49 EDT 2022 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.20/0.50 Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving 0.20/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.20/0.50 # Version: 3.0pre003-ho 0.20/0.52 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA. 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.20/0.52 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores 0.20/0.52 # Starting sh2lt with 120s (1) cores 0.20/0.52 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 120s (1) cores 0.20/0.52 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 120s (1) cores 0.20/0.52 # sh2lt with pid 20570 completed with status 0 0.20/0.52 # Result found by sh2lt 0.20/0.52 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA. 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.20/0.52 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores 0.20/0.52 # Starting sh2lt with 120s (1) cores 0.20/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true) 0.20/0.52 # ...ProofStateSinE()=1/1 0.20/0.52 # Search class: HGHSS-FFMF22-SHHFFSBN 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.20/0.52 # Starting lpo8_lambda_fix with 65s (1) cores 0.20/0.52 # lpo8_lambda_fix with pid 20580 completed with status 0 0.20/0.52 # Result found by lpo8_lambda_fix 0.20/0.52 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA. 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.20/0.52 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores 0.20/0.52 # Starting sh2lt with 120s (1) cores 0.20/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true) 0.20/0.52 # ...ProofStateSinE()=1/1 0.20/0.52 # Search class: HGHSS-FFMF22-SHHFFSBN 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.20/0.52 # Starting lpo8_lambda_fix with 65s (1) cores 0.20/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.20/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.20/0.52 0.20/0.52 # Proof found! 0.20/0.52 # SZS status Theorem 0.20/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_22, type, epred1_0: $i > $o). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_23, type, esk1_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_24, type, esk2_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_25, type, esk3_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_26, type, esk4_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_27, type, esk5_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_28, type, esk6_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_29, type, esk7_0: $i > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_30, type, esk8_1: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_31, type, esk9_1: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_32, type, esk10_3: $i > $i > $i > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_33, type, esk11_2: $i > $i > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_34, type, esk12_3: $i > $i > $i > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_35, type, esk13_2: $i > $i > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_36, type, esk14_3: $i > $i > $i > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_37, type, esk15_2: $i > $i > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_38, type, esk16_3: $i > $i > $i > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_39, type, esk17_2: $i > $i > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_40, type, esk18_3: $i > $i > $i > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(decl_41, type, esk19_2: $i > $i > $i). 0.20/0.52 thf(cTHM112B, conjecture, ![X1:$i > $o]:(?[X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X5)) @ X4)|(X3 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X5)) @ X4)))&![X6:$i > $i, X7:$i > $i]:(((![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X6 @ (X7 @ X5))) @ X4)|(X3 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X6 @ (X7 @ X5))) @ X4)))&![X8:$i]:(((X1 @ X8)=>(X1 @ (X6 @ X8)))))<=(![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ X7 @ X4)|(X3 @ X7 @ X4)))&![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ X6 @ X4)|(X3 @ X6 @ X4))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM112B)). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:$i > $o]:(?[X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ X4)|(X3 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ X4)))&![X6:$i > $i, X7:$i > $i]:(((![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ X7 @ X4)|(X3 @ X7 @ X4)))&![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ X6 @ X4)|(X3 @ X6 @ X4))))=>(![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(X6 @ (X7 @ Z0))) @ X4)|(X3 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(X6 @ (X7 @ Z0))) @ X4)))&![X8:$i]:(((X1 @ X8)=>(X1 @ (X6 @ X8))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM112B])])])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X20:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X21:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X25:$i, X26:$i]:((((((X20 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21) @ X25)|(X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21) @ X25)|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21)))&((X20 @ (esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21) @ X26)|(X21 @ (esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21) @ X26)|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21))))&((((epred1_0 @ (esk5_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21)))&(~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk5_2 @ X20 @ X21)))|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21))))&(((epred1_0 @ (esk5_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21)))&(~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk5_2 @ X20 @ X21)))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21))))))&((((X20 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21) @ X25)|(X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21) @ X25)|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21)))&((X20 @ (esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21) @ X26)|(X21 @ (esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21) @ X26)|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21))))&((((epred1_0 @ (esk5_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21)))&(~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk5_2 @ X20 @ X21)))|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21))))&(((epred1_0 @ (esk5_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21)))&(~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk5_2 @ X20 @ X21)))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X20 @ X21 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X20 @ X21))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X20 @ X21)))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_3, plain, ![X30:$i]:(((esk7_0 @ X30)=(X30))), introduced(definition)). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)|(X3 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)|~((((X3 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3)))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)|(X3 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)|~((X3 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X52:$i]:(((esk7_0 @ X52)=(X52))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X49:$i, X50:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X51:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((esk6_2 @ X51 @ X50 @ X49)=(esk2_2 @ X50 @ X51 @ (esk3_2 @ X50 @ X51 @ X49)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i]:((((esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))))=(esk7_0))|(X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0))))) @ X4))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_5])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X4:$i]:(((esk7_0 @ X4)=(X4))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)|(X3 @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)|~((((X2 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3)))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i]:(((esk6_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4)=(esk2_2 @ X3 @ X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X3 @ X2 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i, X5:$i]:((((esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ X4)=(X4))|(X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0))))) @ X5))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]), c_0_9])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X29:$i, X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((esk6_2 @ X3 @ X2 @ X29)=(esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ X29)))), introduced(definition)). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)|(X3 @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)|~((X2 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i, X5:$i]:((((esk3_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ X4)=(esk6_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ X2 @ X4))|(X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0))))) @ X5))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:((~((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X3))))|~((((X3 @ (esk6_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X3)))=(($true))))|~((((X3 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3)))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3]), c_0_13])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X3))|~((((X3 @ (esk6_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X3)))=(($true))))|~((((X3 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3)))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3]), c_0_13])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i]:((((esk1_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))) @ X2)=(X4))|(X2 @ (esk3_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))) @ X2) @ X4))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_14])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i]:((((esk3_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))))=(esk6_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ X2))|(X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0))))) @ X4))), inference(pos_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:((~((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X3))))|~((X3 @ (esk6_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X3)))|~((X3 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X3))|~((X3 @ (esk6_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X3)))|~((X3 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:((((esk6_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))))=(esk7_0))|((esk1_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))))=(X4)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])])])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)|(X3 @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)|~((((X3 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3)))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i, X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0))))) @ X4)|((esk6_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ X2)!=(esk7_0))|~((epred1_0 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0))))))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_12])])])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:((((esk1_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))))=(X4))|(epred1_0 @ (esk5_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])])])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)|(X3 @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)|~((X3 @ esk7_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:(((esk1_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))))=(X4))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25])])]), c_0_22])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:(((esk3_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))))=(esk7_0))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_27])])])])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_29, plain, ![X4:$i]:(((esk6_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0)))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))))=(esk7_0))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_28])])])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:((epred1_0 @ (esk5_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z1)!=(X4)))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(esk7_0))))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_29])])])). 0.20/0.52 thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_30])]), c_0_29])])]), ['proof']). 0.20/0.52 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.20/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 1 0.20/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.20/0.52 # Initial clauses : 14 0.20/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.20/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 14 0.20/0.52 # Processed clauses : 89 0.20/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 1 0.20/0.52 # ...subsumed : 17 0.20/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 71 0.20/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 26 0.20/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.20/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.20/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 2 0.20/0.52 # Generated clauses : 164 0.20/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 102 0.20/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.20/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1 0.20/0.52 # Paramodulations : 81 0.20/0.52 # Factorizations : 0 0.20/0.52 # NegExts : 12 0.20/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 31 0.20/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.20/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0 0.20/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.20/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.20/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.20/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.20/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.20/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.20/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.20/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.20/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.20/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.20/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 51 0.20/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7 0.20/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.20/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 0 0.20/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 44 0.20/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 41 0.20/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 110 0.20/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.20/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 20 0.20/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 418 0.20/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 301 0.20/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 18 0.20/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 89 0.20/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.20/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4 0.20/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 1 0.20/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 89 0.20/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0 0.20/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 15276 0.20/0.52 0.20/0.52 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.20/0.52 # User time : 0.016 s 0.20/0.52 # System time : 0.003 s 0.20/0.52 # Total time : 0.019 s 0.20/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1932 pages 0.20/0.52 0.20/0.52 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.20/0.52 # User time : 0.017 s 0.20/0.52 # System time : 0.004 s 0.20/0.52 # Total time : 0.021 s 0.20/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages 0.20/0.52 EOF